I think there are too many stories squeezed in one episode.
I'm a little bothered.
Again, I don't take a lot seriously, and can't help but crack up a little when some people are presented as so.
When it comes to connections, things are not quite clear with who sees who as who. It looked like there was a rumor where my newest romance could have been talking about me behind my back, representing someone else talking to me, or that we're all the same scattered people and it is just a mind game of spacial vibes. Maybe a distance factor is that I'm too "far away" vague and unclear for him to understand.
Despite rumors on this episode, I found some positive rumors elsewhere and even had a positive conversation with him today on the phone.
As for other possible connections, he represents himself and when I talk to him, I direct the conversation to him in a still confused way.
But, as for the catty connections, it gets pretty complicated.
I can't see who everyone represents, so I am just going to talk about my own ideas.
Aside from the main drama, I think I am being provoked again with the lesbian issue. I'm mad at arrogance of others. I'm mad that I'm framed to come across as a lesbian pervert. I think some women really want my abuse. I've never even kissed a woman let alone sleep with a woman. I can own up to some attractions, but I am tired of all of the arrogant provoking.
As for the issue of the town as a whole. Sid is definitely playing another game with me. I'm not going to say much about him, but I'll go back to talking about the story.
I get confused with who may ultimately represent Paul. I have a couple of guesses, one is from a distance, the other is actually local. But I don't know the Paul character personally.
Anyway, it really was ashame what happened on Wisteria Lane.
Even though Paul was the issue of cause for the entire trampling; he put up a blacksheep argument at the end.
What makes everyone else so different than these convicts?
As with a lot of other things I think, to each his own when making personal judgement. However, it was a group, a community that the debate revolved around.
There were actually some defenders for the convicts, but it was mostly people that were against them.
In my own personal life, I would probably be a snob to a person who is especially a stranger or someone that I already know I hate.
But thinking outside of myself and regardless of whether a person is involved in my life or not; I think I would have been passive with the issue. I would not have complained, I probably would not even have been a sign holder. The thing is, despite so many other past drama in just a show drama, the neighborhood is a nice neighborhood. It would probably be more acceptable and not even thought of to put a halfway house in a part of town that was povertous already. The problem is, just like jail, there is still probably more opportunity in a povertous community to get back in the same habits. Of course, survival would be harder because povertous communities sometimes already have their own crimes that they deal with, and even a higher crime rate compared to more affluent communities.
So, how should the issue be resolved?
Is it really fair for people who have made an honest living their whole lives, have their survival threatened more than usual to people who have not lived honest lives by having a halfway house in their community?
Like I said, some people will be selfish, other people might be a little more thoughtful of having some kind of hope that an out of jail convict may actually have a change in life.
I have noticed systematically it usually does happen when people out of prison start from square one by living poorly, and maybe some even work their way back up. Some people even out of jail can find ways to beat the odds when they even have a prison record.
Of course everyone should still have rights. I think some convicts probably have some kind of probationary period after prison though. Either way, they eventually get complete rights back. Some people are already wealthy or have wealthy families so there is not much to sweat unless the family disowns that person.
I would think to myself that a halfway house doesn't necessarily have to be defined by a wealth of a community. If I were to suggest anything, I would suggest if a person cares so much to construct a halfway house and has an honest heart, the person would be a little more reasonable and negotiating. I would make sure the house is definitely not placed in a location that has a high population of children. I would probably have the house within a reasonable distance of commodity. Something that is kind of a house on its own out in the woods somewhere, but reasonable distance in being able to get things they need and where finding transportation to get to and from places is not as difficult either. There should still be consideration for convicts and making sure that their needs are met.
However, Paul makes it clear that he is out for revenge. So, I really do see Paul as the evil one in this situation. He does not have a good motive. Sure, he could be taking care of them with shelter. Does he seriously invest the time though in teaching independent living? Will he make them his servants moreso in some kind of way? He has a degree of gangsterism to him that he would be vengeful and even a little threatening with convict characteristics.
So, I don't think anyone's probably going to die.
Not sure how to translate or connect all possible rumors.
But, I'd like to see how next week goes.
